An answering AI repeats what it retrieves. That is the point of it — it is meant to stick to your pages instead of making things up — and it is also its limit. In the ClashEval benchmark (NeurIPS 2024), six leading models were given documents with a deliberately wrong answer planted in them. They adopted the wrong content, over their own correct knowledge, more than 60% of the time.
Those were general-knowledge questions, where a model at least has something of its own to go on. For your company's dates, owners and decisions it has nothing: the page is the only source it has.
When two retrieved pages conflict, a Google Research study of conflicting sources in search-augmented models found that models often struggle to resolve the conflict appropriately; prompting them to reason about it explicitly helps, without closing the gap.
Even a model that handles it perfectly can only tell you that two pages disagree. Which one holds was decided somewhere the assistant cannot read.